
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dig Day Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/2008/06/09/dig-day-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/2008/06/09/dig-day-update/</link>
	<description>Black Canon Collective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WillH</title>
		<link>http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/2008/06/09/dig-day-update/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>WillH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/?p=65#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Step down : ) road gap : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Step down : ) road gap : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew.denham</title>
		<link>http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/2008/06/09/dig-day-update/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew.denham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/?p=65#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Good work Ben
We&#039;ll certainly spend the first 30 mins or so scoping out the most suited route to work on based around the defult which will be the existing BBMS line.
If there exists a better hybrid option that can be acheived within the weekend (or even first day) then it&#039;ll get priority.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work Ben<br />
We&#8217;ll certainly spend the first 30 mins or so scoping out the most suited route to work on based around the defult which will be the existing BBMS line.<br />
If there exists a better hybrid option that can be acheived within the weekend (or even first day) then it&#8217;ll get priority.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/2008/06/09/dig-day-update/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>boin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcanoncollective.co.uk/?p=65#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I went up to the site last night with mi pop and dog,  spotted a new potential medium sized step down where they&#039;ve been felling trees.   I also scoped out a new line coming off bbms, just after the rutted corner (badger skull), it goes down toward a roadgap, (over that rodedendrone mound) then cuts further along the hill than the old line, which I think is better because the old line I felt used to much of the hill very quickly, plus with the forestry operations happening so close I think we should aim further inside the western section of woods.   I also scoped out a new run in into bbms, which comes straighter onto the (what we thought was bridelway) and there&#039;s plenty of room for us to have a better run in I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went up to the site last night with mi pop and dog,  spotted a new potential medium sized step down where they&#8217;ve been felling trees.   I also scoped out a new line coming off bbms, just after the rutted corner (badger skull), it goes down toward a roadgap, (over that rodedendrone mound) then cuts further along the hill than the old line, which I think is better because the old line I felt used to much of the hill very quickly, plus with the forestry operations happening so close I think we should aim further inside the western section of woods.   I also scoped out a new run in into bbms, which comes straighter onto the (what we thought was bridelway) and there&#8217;s plenty of room for us to have a better run in I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

